As an aspiring architect, this image makes me realize how far away modern architects have moved from the antique forms present here. Doors of varying height...right next to each other?! How strange. Custom-made railing for a stair?! How expensive. Ornamented ceilings?! How useless.
This image alone shows how powerful a single room can be when it brings light inside eloquently. Every part of this room is unique to itself, and shows an antiquated attention to detail rarely seen today, where contractors bring in catalog materials across the world to make a building.
I like how the paint peeling off the walls adds another layer of detail to the shot, when the viewer's eyes have a general sense of what the doors and window look like. This added level made me want to take a harder look at everything all over again. I notice the flakes on the floor, the doorbell between the doors, and the golden leaves on the railing.
What I love most about this shot in particular is how Matthias pays attention to the attention to detail. He bisects the frame with the unique railing, and lets the doors and window become their own entities. All of his photos are a tribute to how these older styles remain beautiful, even when in decay.
Did the self-proclaimed critic above just call indoor ceiling ornaments useless? Wow. Just yesterday, I was admiring indoor ceiling ornaments at a train station while waiting for a transfer. I'm so thankful for the architecture of the past, because unlike modern architecture, you can look at it for hours and never get tired of it. I LOVE indoor ornaments and I think it's a crime that it's not being done anymore.
No, he did not himself call them useless. He's using irony to make a point that in today's modern world, these things are considered odd, expensive and useless. It's called irony and he's talking aloud to the audience. I can't believe that isn't obvious. He's talking aloud about today's world verses the world of many years ago in history. It's a fantastic picture and makes one want to ask so many questions.
I like the picture too. It's true that he could be using irony, though he doesn't really set it up (that's the problem about written form - you have to use markers where you would use your tone in spoken language). Nevertheless, my problem wasn't with how much honesty he was using, my problem was with the thought even ocurring to him. Modern architects looking at such beauty and calling it useless? Even if he was quoting someone else, the thought really irritates me.
did you read the whole comment? it sounds like you just read that first part. if you read carefully, you'd realize the critic above admires the beauty of the building, the ornaments included. his statements about the uselessness of the ornamented ceiling is most probably a reference to the cannons of modern architecture which condemn such abundant decoration, rather than his own opinion on the matter.
Yep, I did read the whole thing. He didn't contradict the "useless" statement - but subtext is always up for interpretation, so you can definitely argue that it was there. However, you have nothing to hold against me.